Microsoft going to make concessions in the deal with Activision Blizzard, to avoid objections from the antimonopoly regulator of the European Union. According to Reuters, in the coming weeks, the American corporation will offer a 10-year license agreement Sony.
In Europe, the transaction investigation commission will accept the objections of the parties until the end of January. At the same time, a similar agreement Microsoft, which the company voiced earlier, the Japanese did not comment on.
The source of the publication noted that it is not known how the antimonopolists of other countries will react to such a concession where the deal is being considered. While she was approved only in Brazil, Saudi Arabia and Serbia.
Microsoft In response to a journalistic request, she assured that she was working to solve the problem with officials:
The leader of the industry Sony He says that he is worried Call of Duty, But we stated that we intend to make the same game available on the same day on Xbox and PlayStation. We want people to have more access to games, and not less.
Meanwhile, the USA may completely challenge the deal in court. In response to this executive director Activision Blizzard called the speculation on "anti -competitive character"Absorption"absurdity".
Microsoft: Sony has more cult exclusives. And Sony accused Mikov of trying to "make Nintendo out of it
November 29, 2022 Vsevolod Kuznetsov voices Yeltsin and toilet in the game about aliens on the collective farm
November 29, 2022 High sales Cyberpunk 2077 helped CDPR give a record third quarter
The best comments
These showdowns are increasingly reminiscent of the battle of toad and vipers. Both offices are soft and fluffy, not at all monopolists, only think about players and forget about profit.
Sorry, but this is a http://lunaslots-casino.co.uk/ naive judgment, I myself work in a large company and saw how it went from medium -sized business to a large one and I know very well how priorities change, over time the idea to provide services more and cheaper for customers has become more ideas from customers, even if you provide them with discounts (discounts are just a way to attract). Yes, even if you start the analysis of large companies with employees, if you ask why they are there, then in 99% of cases they will say that for the sake of money, and when you ask what they think about customers, they will say very unfortunate words, which they will naturally say to customers.
And if you directly answer your question:
Who said that companies need to officially declare their intentions? Also, the company without money on the only good attitude to the client will not go far, unless it is charitable, it seems to us that they are good at us, but this is just maintaining their brand, and on the expense of branding a ton of books was written, including the brand, as a brand is postponed in our subconscious (autopsy or the system is more convenient), I advise you to get acquainted)
Well … whoever says what, but the primary goal of any major company is a profit, customers are always in second place. Even when they say that they work for the consumer, they will be a little crafty, they work with their consumer money) and you don’t need to confuse all this with greed, it’s just an economic relationship, a large company will not live without it, these small organizations can essentially exist in the idea and somehow make ends meet, but the large one should generate huge amounts of money, otherwise it will quickly bend.
Disney conveys fiery greetings
But interestingly, Pop Corn has prepared?
And imagine if such tough antimonopoly organs in the CIS countries were. Who would then approve the absorption of mail.ru Group VKontakte at one time. After all, they created a mega monopolist in the market))
And the second platform on which Microsoft sells its games is accidentally called Microsoft Windows?
Yes, with 20th Century Fox – especially sad.
Monopoly on its games is called intellectual property. No one has canceled it yet, otherwise the point of creating at least something in principle will disappear.
Profit depends on the number of players on their platforms. So you can at least be joking, but in fact fill and Sonya, the priests tear for the sake of players. So that some do not change the platform to another.
And Sony is a monopolist?
Fortunately, different people are engaged in courts and development. But if the “efforts” are replaced with “money”, then I completely agree.
What can I say, if you have such an opinion, then you have a good environment, as a rule, people judge everything on the basis of experience accumulated in interaction with what surrounds us, if you are able to think about the structure that exists to earn money, it means you are doing well and to convince you)
Yeah. I prepare a pop root and a fri potato 🙂 In anticipation of further news.
And you are sure that you know about the meaning of the word "monopoly"?
I would like to quit all their efforts to create games, and not on the courts, etc.D. Dreams of a naive gamer ..
To go out of the logic. Put yourself in the place of the author of some kind of intellectual property. Something has not taken off, your company wants to buy some large corporation, and the choice gets up: either to bankrupt, but with your intellectual property, or do not remember hunger, but your unique development will be able to use all who are not lazy for free.
T -shirts also sell in Steam, it finally dawned on them that the audience of the consoles and the PC may not intersect at all.
When it dawned on them, they began to sell their games in MS Store, and not in Steam. One of the first games that came simultaneously on Xbox and Windows was Quantum Break in 2016. And one of the first games from MS in Steam was GEARS 5 in 2019. Then they re -released part of the MS Store games in Steam, but such games as, for example, GEARS of WAR 4, Forza Horizon 3, Forza Motorsport 7 remained Exluus MS Store. And if FH3 and FM7 have already been removed from sale, then if you want to play GEARS of WAR 4, then welcome to MS Store.